Categories
Learn

Quarterly Letter – Fourth Quarter 2024

INTRODUCTION

As we bid farewell to the first quarter of the 21stcentury, we stand at the crossroads of innovation and uncertainty, where the echoes of past challenges mingle with the whispers of future possibilities. In this letter, our CEO John Bird explores how perspectives of political events have shifted over time, challenging our understanding of economic decision-making. Our CIO Jason Ware remarks on the economics of 2024, setting the stage for an intriguing financial landscape in 2025.Then, Senior Wealth Advisor Anders Skagerberg, standing at the threshold of this new year with its opportunities and challenges, looks to turn your aspirations into achievable goals and navigate the evolving landscape of personal finance with confidence and clarity.

FROM JOHN BIRD’S DESK

While inauguration day is still several weeks away it’s clear President elect Trump is already having an impact on how we view policy and economics domestically and globally. Markets responded favorably to his propensity toward deregulation and lower taxes. Individual reactions to Trump’s statements vary wildly depending on preconceived notions of his policy and personal views of his character. This is normal. Yet for the better part of a century the field of economics treated human emotions as secondary. When and why did economics become a field viewing itself as distinct from politics specifically and the vagaries of the human condition writ large?

The study of political economy evolved in the sixteenth century as philosophers of the time worked to understand the interplay of government policy and household management. These early writers wanted to know how we as individuals made decisions and how
government policy choices impacted those decisions. Adam Smith is perhaps the best known visionary in this school of thought though there were several others influential at the time. An overriding thesis was the notion that allowing for individual incentives fostered greater creativity, effort, and wealth creation than dictates from on high.

Centuries later, toward the end of the eighteen hundreds physical sciences were expanding understanding of our natural world through the scientific method and increased use of mathematics. It was in this period that the term “economics” began to supplant “political economy” as the field worked to shift more toward mathematical modeling of economic decision making with less reliance on factoring in the human emotional element driving the course of our economic path.

In the twentieth century the study of economics was dominated by factors that could be quantified. Numbers ruled the roost. And this period gave us volumes of insights into the working of our economic system which continue to help guide policy and investment decisions today. Yet an awareness of the importance of human behavior in economics can scarcely be overstated. Many of us work to be logical in our decision-making. But when we pull the trigger, it is the emotion of the moment that compels us to act. As investors we ignore this reality at our peril.

The University of Michigan collects data on consumer sentiment based on political party and the insights are a striking example of how our worldview impacts our perceptions. The information highlights that when a democrat is elected to the oval office democratic consumer sentiment spikes upward while republican sentiment plummets. When a republican is elected the effect is inverted. These changes in sentiment are at best loosely correlated (and typically not correlated at all) to unemployment rates, income growth, interest rates or other quantifiable factors that impact aggregate financial well-being. Rather, it’s us as humans acting … human. Turns out how we feel about something has a big impact.

When we look at how we respond to various events – like elections – it’s clear that “political economy” is a better way of understanding our environment and our behaviors than economics alone. It’s also essential to note that while we may understand the why of the financial markets a bit better that doesn’t mean we should change our approach. We continue to invest in companies with competitive advantages that can be sustained for the foreseeable future. We continue to hold those companies regardless of the emotions of the moment. Sometimes in the face of emotional swings so common to our human condition our best course of action is to follow the advice of the white rabbit in Lewis Carrol’s Alice in Wonderland: “Don’t just do something, stand there.” As we enter 2025, we will keep the wise words of said rabbit in mind and keep a steady hand on the tiller of your investments. Thank you for your continued trust and confidence in the Albion team. We wish you a healthy and prosperous new year.

ECONOMY & MARKETS by Jason Ware

What a charmed time this has been for Wall Street! The economy and earnings are doing well. Inflation and interest rates are coming down. Shoppers are outshopping. The US dollar has rallied, and the incoming administration is assumed to be more business friendly. The stock market is in its happy place as evidenced by yet another +20% annual gain. As we close out the year, let us explore each.

The US economy is strong. The labor market is healthy, people are pending, we have a boom in technology capex(AI and Cloud), and there remains a sturdy pro-growth fiscal tailwind. Things look fine today (nothing in the data points to recession) and growth in the years ahead should be stronger than the decade pre-Covid … not by a lot, but better … on rising real incomes, sustained expansionary policies from the Beltway, strong spending and investment on infrastructure and technology, and enhanced productivity.

On prices, the 2021-23 inflation problem has been solved. Not in terms of price level, that’s not going back down (a good thing). But as it relates to price growth, we’re now far better off. While the Fed’s 2% target remains elusive, we are close. Our view holds (for a few reasons) that we can expect inflation roughly in the mid-2s … that 2% will be this cycle’s floor not its ceiling (like in the 2010s) … and that’s just fine. Anything under 3% should be constructive for the economy and financial markets.

Meanwhile, the Fed is now in an easing cycle with a goal to arrive at “neutral.” For those with better things to do than study magic numbers in economics, the neutral rate is essentially inflation plus what economists call “r-star” (r*)– a real rate of interest that’s said to balance the economy. Neutral policy is neither expansionary nor contractionary. Presently, we consider this level to be perhaps 3.5-4.0% (note: for its part, the Fed currently thinks it’s 3%). Meaning, if things go well, we can expect a couple more quarter-point cuts along this path. Now, it’s possible (probable?) this won’t go perfectly to plan without some hiccups, but it could. And if so, that’s conceptually the track forward.

Bond yields take their cues from this base rate math. If 3.5-4.0% represents neutral fed funds and a reasonable term premium for the 10-year Treasury is maybe 1.0% or so, then 4.5-5.0% would be structural equilibrium. On the investment grade corporate side, add about +0.75-1.0% in risk premium. Certainly, these things will move around based on factors like mood, geopolitics, prospects for growth, inflation, and government deficits, making real-time bond yields messier than this straight-forward theoretical exercise. Nevertheless, today is a pretty good time to lock in yields, where appropriate, for balanced accounts.

Over in equity land, unsurprisingly we remain long run bullish on US stocks. The American system endures as the most innovative, dynamic, nimble, and resourceful economy on the planet. The finest universities, brightest minds, and most cutting-edge companies all reside here, not to mention the deepest and most efficient capital markets around. Combined, this is what Buffett calls the “American tailwind” – a force the now 94-year-old sage still believes will propel us onward in the years and decades to come. We agree. Accordingly, our belief is that stock prices will continue to do what they’ve always done: track the general direction of workforce demographics, economic growth, innovation, and business profits, all of which move up over time taking with them the long-term oriented investor.

Speaking of corporate profits, the single biggest item that informs stock prices, they’re at record highs. It’s likely that the S&P 500 logged ~$240 in earnings-per share (EPS) in 2024. If the economy holds up (our base case) we could see ~$275 in 2025 and perhaps ~$300 in 2026! For perspective, EPS troughed at ~$138 during Covid and was ~$162 the year before the pandemic. US companies are quite skilled at making money. More importantly, our portfolio companies continue to shine on this front. We still skew positive for our outlook on corporate earnings. Naturally though, there are some warts. Notable is valuation as stocks aren’t cheap. However we don’t deem them as expensive as those who cite “24x”, CAPE, or whatever. Moreover, it depends on where one chooses to look. Are there expensive parts of the market? Absolutely. More attractive expanses? Totally. At the index level, the S&P 500 currently has a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) of just over 24x 2024 EPS and 21x that of 2025. Again, not cheap, but not crazy either. It’s been higher at times, and P/E is a terrible timing tool (its best use is to gage expected returns over longer periods, like a decade) so we can’t glean much from these figures as to where the market goes short run. Resultantly, we judge valuation as OK especially if earnings are expanding, inflation is benign, and we’re in an easing cycle with sensible and stable(ish) long rates. Too, post-election, we believe that earnings over the next year or two might come in higher than existing estimates on the notion that less regulation, lower taxes, and increased buybacks could fuel even loftier figures. We’ll see.

Underneath the index level, technology, AI, and the ‘Mag 7’ do look richer relative to other areas, while most everything else is cheaper (S&P 500 is ~16x ex-tech). Spots like health care (and other “defensives”), industrials, REITs, small caps, mid-caps, international, all sport lower valuations – both on a relative and absolute basis. The practical application of this being that portfolio construction and investment tilts matter, while diversification is still the only “free lunch” when investing. If equities broaden out (in earnest) in 2025, it’ll be important to have suitable exposures while preserving deliberate tilts toward quality businesses in tech and growing consumer names. Adding up the puts and takes, we think it unlikely the S&P 500 will be driven by multiple expansion in the years to come. Rather, earnings growth may contribute the lion’s share of the return. But don’t let that get you down beat. If earnings compound at, say, +6-8% (utterly doable) while dividends and buybacks add another couple percent, then the S&P 500 as purely an “earnings growth and shareholder returns story” can be a good stock market indeed. Falling P/Es would be a head wind to this calculus, but for now that’s not our expectation.

As we look ahead to 2025 we are calling it “A Year of Three-Twos.” That is, a US economy firmly growing mid-2s; (core) US inflation settling into the mid-2s; and a Fed that maybe cuts 2 times. 222 … an “angel number” (let’s hope!). Of course, amid all these variables and moving parts we’ll continue to do our job as your investment manager in navigating the landscape for our companies / investments. Thanks for your continued trust in us, and Happy New Year!

PLANNERS CORNER by Anders Skagerberg

As we step into 2025, the planning team remains committed to guiding you to a lifetime of good decisions. 

The start of a new year is a chance to reflect, refocus, and take meaningful steps toward your financial goals. Whether you’re planning for a major milestone, fine-tuning your retirement plan, or simply looking to enhance your financial knowledge, we’re here to support you every step of the way.

Looking back, 2024 was a big year – markets were up, we had a presidential election, and so much more. As we look forward to the new year, no one knows for certain what it will hold, but we’re confident that with thoughtful planning and a focus on what truly matters, it can be a year of progress, opportunity, and positive change.

In this planner’s corner update, we will cover:

  1. How to Crush Your Financial Goals in 2025
    Practical tips and strategies to set meaningful goals, automate your success, and celebrate progress along the way.
  1. Key Updates for 2025
    A look at higher contribution limits, expanded gifting opportunities, Social Security adjustments, and new catch-up provisions for those nearing retirement. 
  1. What We’re Working on This Quarter
    An overview of our initiatives, from updating RMD calculations to integrating income and employer benefits changes into your financial plan.

Let’s make 2025 a year of financial progress and success. Together, we’ll navigate the opportunities and challenges ahead with confidence and clarity!

Next, How to Crush Your Financial Goals in 2025

As we kick off the new year, it’s the perfect moment to take a step back and think about what matters most to you—and how your finances can support that vision. 

Depending on your stage of life, your financial goals might be less about growing your wealth and more about maintaining it, simplifying your financial life, or finding ways to use your money to create lasting memories with those you love. 

Whatever your focus, the key is to make your goals clear and actionable.

Instead of aiming to “save more” or “spend less,” think about specifics. Maybe you want to fund a family trip, increase your charitable giving, or update your estate plan. Having a concrete goal gives you something to measure progress against—and makes it much easier to see the finish line.

Once you’ve clarified your goals, it’s time to focus on how to make them happen. One of the simplest ways to stay on track is to automate whenever possible. Automating your distributions, bill payments, or even charitable contributions ensures you’re consistent without having to think about it too much. Plus, it gives you more time and energy to focus on what really matters—whether that’s planning your next adventure, enjoying time with family, or pursuing a hobby you love.

Of course, flexibility is just as important as structure. Life has a way of throwing curveballs—unexpected expenses, changes in tax laws, or even an unexpected opportunity you want to pursue. Having some wiggle room in your financial plan can help you roll with the punches while staying on track. For some, that might mean keeping a healthy amount of cash on hand or simply revisiting their plan more regularly to make adjustments.

As you think about the year ahead, it’s also worth reflecting on the bigger picture. How does your financial plan fit into the legacy you’re building? Maybe it’s about leaving something meaningful for your loved ones or supporting causes you’re passionate about. Having a conversation with your family about your values, your estate plan, or even your charitable intentions can make all the difference in ensuring your vision is carried forward in the way you intend.

Finally, don’t forget to pause and appreciate the progress you’ve already made. Achieving your goals—big or small—is worth celebrating. 

Whether it’s checking off a bucket-list experience, reaching a financial milestone, or simply enjoying the peace of mind that comes with knowing you’re on track, these moments matter. They remind us that financial success isn’t just about the numbers; it’s about living the life you want and sharing it with the people you love.

Here’s to making 2025 a year full of progress, purpose, and the joy that comes from seeing your hard work pay off.

Next up, here are some key financial updates to be aware of for 2025.

Key Updates for 2025:
  • Higher Contribution Limits:

401(k)/Roth 401(k): Increased to $23,500, with a $7,500 catch-up for those aged 50+.

IRA/Roth IRA: Remains at $7,000 with an additional $1,000 catch-up if you’re 50+.

HSA: Increased to $4,300 for individuals and $8,550 for families, with a $1,000 catch-up for those aged 55+.

Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs): Increased to $108,000 for those over age 70.5. This can be a great way to support the charities you love while receiving valuable tax savings.

  • Social Security Benefits COLA Increase:

Social Security benefits will receive a 2.5% Cost-of-living increase for 2025.

  • Expanded Gifting Opportunities:

The annual gift tax exclusion has increased to $19,000, (up from $18,000) offering more opportunities for tax-efficient wealth transfers. This means that you can give $19,000 tax-free each year to any person. For a couple, that’s a combined $38,000 per year they can give to a single person.

  • NEW “Extra” Catch-Up Contributions for those age 60, 61, 62, and 63:

Larger catch-up contribution limits are now in place for those aged 60-63, making it easier to save more if you’re nearing retirement age. The limit is $11,250 instead of $7,500. This is a new change as of this year and is part of the Secure 2.0 Act passed in 2022.

  • Inherited IRA RMDs

If you inherited an IRA from someone other than your spouse after January 1, 2020, the SECURE Act introduced a 10-year rule requiring the account to be fully distributed by the end of the 10th year following the original owner’s death. For beneficiaries where the original account owner had already begun taking required minimum distributions (RMDs), the IRS requires annual RMDs in addition to the account being emptied by the end of the 10-year period.

However, due to clarifications and administrative challenges, the IRS waived the annual RMD requirement for 2020 through 2024. This means that even if you didn’t take any distributions during these years, you did not face penalties. Starting in 2025, the annual RMD requirement will resume, and beneficiaries must take these distributions or potentially face penalties. The 10-year deadline for fully depleting the account remains unchanged.

If you are interested in learning more about any of these updates or need additional clarification, as always, we are here to support you. 

Next up, here are some of the things we are working on this quarter as well as a few action items for you.

What We’re Working on This Quarter

The start of the year is always a busy time, and we’re focused on ensuring your financial plan is positioned for success. Here’s what the planning team is focused on:

  • Calculating Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) for those who need them. For those who take monthly distributions to satisfy your RMD, we will be updating those amounts as well to reflect your new RMD for the year. 
  • Updating Payroll Information and Benefits: If you’ve had changes in pay or recently made benefits elections during open enrollment, we’re integrating those updates into your plan.
  • Annual Tax Packages: for those with taxable accounts (non-retirement accounts) you will be receiving your annual tax package that includes a summary of your portfolio income for 2024. Reminder: this is not a tax document, just a summary. Investment account tax documents will be available from custodians starting in mid-February.

Action Items for You:

  • If you’ve received a raise, send us your updated pay stub so we can adjust your financial plan accordingly.
  • If your employer has an open enrollment period, share your benefits details with us to ensure your elections align with your goals.

Of course, this list is just a glimpse of what we’re focusing on this quarter. As always, we’re here to handle the details so you can stay focused on what matters most.

Ultimately, we’re thrilled to kick off another year of partnering with you to make thoughtful, informed financial decisions. Here’s to a successful and prosperous 2025!


Albion Financial Group is an SEC registered investment advisor. The information provided is intended solely for educational purposes and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any particular securities product, service, or investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Additional information about Albion Financial Group is also available on the SEC’s website at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov under CRD number 105957. Albion Financial Group only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, notice filed or excluded or exempted from registration or notice filing requirements.

Categories
Learn

White Paper: Understanding the Nuances in Investment Performance

Measuring investment performance is an art, not a science. For many this notion can prompt an uncomfortable response as it repudiates what should be entirely impartial statistical information. The reality however is that there are many subjective conditions that dictate the numerical output of such analyses. Therefore, it is important to have a thorough conversation around various performance data in an effort to understand both its meaning and significance.

The first subjective gate that presented investment performance must pass through is time frame, or the specific period being measured. Take for example the following simple exercise in examining a hypothetical portfolio return versus a stated benchmark (more on benchmarks in a moment). Let’s say an investor owns a portfolio of stocks that exactly mirrors the Russell 2000 basket (“Russell”). At the time this paper was written on a year-to-date (YTD) basis this portfolio had a negative price return of approximately -2.02% through 11/23/2015. As a point of orientation the Dow Jones Industrial Average (“Dow”) is down -0.17% over this same period, resulting in this portfolio underperforming the Dow by roughly -1.85% YTD. What actionable implications can one draw from this data? Should our investor make any changes to our portfolio as a result of this information?

Now let us expand that time horizon by only one short month. Our hypothetical Russell-like portfolio return is now +0.17%, while the Dow is off -0.02%. The relative performance of this portfolio has quickly become +0.19% when studied over this second period of time! Through this lens, is this portfolio doing what is should be doing? Would it have been wise to trade out of this Russell replica portfolio and into the Dow based on our early impressions of period 1?

We are all human beings with instinctive impulses; it’s just the way we’re wired. And in this situation it wouldn’t be unusual for an investor to desire a switch based on information gleaned from the first time period. However, when adding a supplementary data point to the mix – i.e., time period 2 – this instant reaction in labeling the portfolio as an “underperformer” may have been a rush to judgement and warrants further examination.

In an effort to counter this urge an analysis of these two strategies over a longer observable period is a good place to start. Put differently, which portfolio has delivered ample and steady returns over time? In our hypothetical scenario we see the Russell basket returning +73.5%, +163.5%, and +280.8% over 10-, 15-, and 20-year periods, respectively. An investment in the Dow, meanwhile, would have delivered +64.6%, +71.1%, and +251.2%, respectively, over these same periods. How would we imagine our hypothetical investor to behave had we began our analysis with this perspective? Or perhaps even more frightening, what would have been the financial impact to one’s portfolio if they had made the decision back in, say, the year 2001 to switch from the Russell strategy to the Dow after a couple of bad months, or even bad years?

To be sure, overactive short-termism and myopic performance chasing can be damaging to an investor’s financial goals. On the other hand, long-term ownership of good businesses (stocks) and a focus on performance over extended horizons is a solid beacon in an environment fixed to 24-hour news cycles and a nearsighted measuring of returns. This rhythm affords the astute manager the latitude to administer the indispensable elements of patience and discipline.

Indeed, long-term investors are the financial market equivalent to marathon runners. Yet in today’s fast moving connected world of always-on digital information, social media, intense scrutiny on quarterly earnings results, and enormous pressure to deliver short-term results, we are often clocked every 100-meters as though we are running sprints. This does not make sense and fuels a fundamental mismatch that can lead to flawed measurements, or worse yet strategic mistakes towards an investor meeting their long-term financial goals. Quite simply, it’s the wrong tool for the wrong job – like asking for a hammer to screw in a bolt.

A more suitable and effective analysis is to observe the two portfolios over a much longer period of time in order to smooth out shorter-run dispersions and more clearly assess the consistent pace and performance of an investment portfolio. Patience and discipline are paramount to long-run investment success, much like the way we would evaluate a marathon runner.

The second subjective gate that performance must pass through is relative bench-marking. In our previous example, why did we select the Dow as our relative measure? Why not the S&P 500? Wilshire 5000? German DAX, or the Shenzhen in China? MSCI World index, anybody? How about stocks in the U.S. health care sector, or in energy? Did these perform better or worse than our portfolio? How would the presentation of this material have affected our evaluation? And more important, what can we do with all of this information? Does it make us better or worse decision makers? We belabor the point, but what’s key to appreciate is that there are almost an infinite number of options one can choose when buying stocks (or index funds), and thus scenarios for comparing actual returns against theoretical opportunities are equally as vast.

We certainly recognize that it is easy to get caught up in the media hype obsessing over the one or two most widely-cited indices. Nevertheless, we believe that this focus is an arbitrary exercise and tells us nothing about the merits of an individual investor’s portfolio needs, strategy, and financial goals.

Albion Equity Performance

With this understanding we encourage our clients to apply the same analytical framework when assessing Albion’s investment management acumen. And we are pleased to report that our marks here are emphatically positive. Our ultimate goal as holistic wealth managers is to help our client’s reach theirs. At present we currently manage assets for over 400 families, across 2,000+ accounts, each with unique situations and needs. This custom and client-centered approach does not lend itself to a one-size-fits-all performance figure. Rather, we firmly believe that the purest gauge in measuring our value and determining our performance can be seen by whether or not our clients are happy and retain our services. Indeed, it is this behavior that embodies the most conclusive vote of confidence and judgement of our ability we can think of.

Albion has been in business for 39 years, and over this time our annual client turnover rate is approximately 2%. This is a very low level for this industry; a fact that we are extremely proud of. In addition to the custom nature of our services, industry rules as they apply to fiduciary managers – the highest standard in the investment industry – makes it quite difficult for us to formally engage in traditional returns reporting conventions.

To help you understand why, a brief description of the difference between fiduciary and suitability standards is necessary. It sounds complicated, but essentially the difference between the two standards refers to the guidelines that spell out the obligations financial services professionals have to their clients.

The suitability standard gives advisers the most wiggle room: It simply requires that investment vehicles fit clients’ investing intents, time horizon, and experience. As a result the suitability standard invites conflicts of interest pertaining to compensation, which can greatly influence what financial products are pushed onto clients. Conversely, the fiduciary standard requires advisers to put their clients’ best interest ahead of their own. For instance, faced with two identical products but with different fees, an adviser under the fiduciary standard would be bound to recommend the one with the least cost to the client, even if it meant fewer dollars in the company’s coffers – and thus his or her own pocket.

We think it is clear which standard is superior, and we take very serious our adherence to these principles. Yet, this also handcuffs us when it comes to presenting official performance data to prospective clients. Meanwhile, those firms that follow the less rigorous and conflict-riddled suitability standard are permitted wide latitude in providing this data. While we argue that this is frustratingly irrational, we also recognize that we do not make the rules and therefore must follow industry regulations as they are, not as we wish them to be.

With that said, here’s what we can share with you.

While we are active managers tirelessly monitoring markets in real-time keenly attune to present information, at our core we are long-term oriented (i.e., the “marathon runner”). Consequently we are proud of the excellent results we have generated for our clients. However there are times when even the best managers will have soft spots in their returns. An example of this for us would be the year 2012 where we left some upside on the table in our equity portfolios and underperformed the broad averages in a conscious decision to protect our clients’ hard-earned nest eggs.

In 2012 the world got very scary, very quickly. The U.S. economy had turned sour in the late-spring (particularly employment data) and Europe was at the height of a potential Greek debt default and ensuing contagion. Not only was Greece looking into the abyss, but the entire European periphery (e.g., Italy, Spain, and Portugal) was fragile enough that any policy misstep would have likely held grave consequences. There were riots in the streets, sweeping anti-euro sentiment, and against this backdrop we made an active decision as active managers to raise cash to protect our client’s assets. Our calculus at the time was while a decent chance did exist that this strategy would dent short-run performance if the market moved higher; the sheer magnitude of the market downside if things collapsed necessitated a defensive posture. Indeed, if the euro had fractured during this time the ripple of global banking contagion, general fear, and economic retrenchment would have been disastrous to equity markets. The probability of such a scenario in our view was high enough to warrant more than a healthy dose of caution. As holistic wealth managers with a fiduciary responsibility we had to act in the best interest of our clients.

Despite these large macro risks the S&P 500 finished the year up +16%, while the Dow returned +10.2%. For us, our abnormally high cash level created a drag on equity returns causing us to end the year only slightly positive. And while this does skew the various short-run performance data sets, we own this decision and would do it again if the environment called for it.

We feel very strongly and take very serious our duty to protect client assets. In our view this form of cognitive, yet assertive risk management cannot be captured by traditional attribution and returns reporting methods. Please do not mistake our explanation as an excuse. Quite the contrary, we believe that it is precisely these types of active decisions and attention to downside protection that helps drive investment returns over the long-run. As such we felt it both appropriate and necessary to provide this context.

As the world chewed through some of the more terrifying moments of that year – e.g., German Supreme Court ruling declaring the euro bailout mechanisms legal; a restructuring of Greek debt from the private sector to the IMF / ECB / EC who could better absorb potential losses; euro members assembling the sound regulatory framework necessary to backstop the financial system; etc. – we scaled back into quality stocks utilizing our time tested rigorous fundamental approach.

Hindsight is always 20/20. Was this a sound decision to go to cash given the severe risks we were seeing, or should we have put our blinders on and gritted our teeth through it? In discussing this with our clients at the time, an analogy we found helpful in imparting our thinking as we made this decision is as follows.

Suppose you were offered a free flight to anywhere in the world. Rome; the pyramids of Egypt; Japan; the South Pacific; any place you’ve most wanted to visit is now at your finger-tips at no cost to you. Sounds great, right? The catch is there’s a 20% chance that the plane you’re riding on will be involved in a horrific crash. Would you accept the offer? Put differently, there’s an 80% chance you make it there just fine. And yet does that make you feel any better about accepting this deal? Probably not. Why? Because the risk – albeit far less likely relative to the odds of a gain – holds such grave consequences that it is simply not wise to chance it. This is precisely how we viewed the stock market and the potential negative impact on our clients’ portfolios during the global chaos in 2012.

Summary

Wealth management has an almost unlimited number of variables and unique situations. Unfortunately, the desire by the media and Wall Street marketing to distill down this complexity into imperfect short-term investment returns data, particularly in cohabitation with a randomly selected arbitrary benchmark, has created a distraction that few can afford to have.

Chasing short-run manager performance can be every bit as damaging to long-run portfolio returns as hopping in and out of hot and cold stocks without any attention paid to the fundamentals of the underlying companies. While we surely understand the virtue of considering market returns as a component of the overall wealth management picture there is far too great a focus placed on it, both versus stated benchmark(s) and over increasingly shorter time horizons.

This works in both directions. When a manager is crushing it with great returns above their specified benchmark over short periods of time, publicizing this as sustainable and reason to invest is every bit as imprudent as eschewing a smart, high quality manager with a laudable and principled investment philosophy demonstrating sound long-run risk-adjusted returns. Sometimes we fall into the former category, but we will always fall into the latter.

Without question, what matters most is creating the right investment portfolio to achieve your financial goals. This is challenging, and candidly it always has been and likely always will be. But, it is a worthy and important goal – one that all of us on the Albion Team are proud to devote our professional careers to helping clients attain.

Jason L. Ware, MBA / Chief Investment Officer
Albion Financial Group
jware@albionfinancial.com
(801) 487-3700